MockJury
Mock jury platform · Private beta

Know how a jury sees your case. Before you walk in.

Twelve synthetic jurors, profiled across 100+ research-backed attributes and calibrated to your exact trial venue. Get invaluable insight in minutes, for a fraction of the cost of traditional mock jury research.

Early access

No spam. One email when we launch. Unsubscribe anytime.

Sample · Middlesex Co., MASynthetic panel
Plaintiff favored
8 of 12 jurors · first-ballot
Median award
$2.4M
Range across panel
$1.1M – $4.8M
Most cited reasoning
The maintenance log was clearly falsified after the fact
Our theses
  1. I

    Depth drives accuracy.

    Each persona is profiled across 100+ attributes — personality structure, moral value priorities, locus of control, belief in a just world, need for cognition, life experiences, numeracy and anchor-sensitivity, and similarity vectors to the parties — each grounded in peer-reviewed research.

  2. II

    Venue determines probability.

    Every US county has a distinct profile and culture that shapes verdict outcomes. MockJury draws from 160,000+ personas calibrated to your exact trial jurisdiction.

  3. III

    Speed is a strategic advantage.

    Traditional mock jury research takes weeks to recruit and days to run. MockJury returns 12 fully profiled juror responses to any question in minutes.

  4. IV

    Cost should not determine access.

    Jury consulting has historically required six-figure budgets. MockJury delivers the same simulation depth to every trial attorney for a fraction of the cost.

  5. V

    Iteration wins cases.

    The ability to test a framing, refine it, and test again — in the same afternoon — is a preparation advantage that no traditional research method can offer.

  6. VI

    The narrative gap is where cases are won.

    Jurors impose story structures on evidence, anchor differently depending on their numeracy and worldview, and are more predictable from their pre-trial attitudes than from the evidence itself.

Founded on research
The story model is based on the hypothesis that jurors impose a narrative story organization on trial information.
Pennington & Hastie — "The Story Model for Juror Decision Making," Inside the Juror (Cambridge University Press, 1993)